Tag abuse

Mar. 13th, 2016 09:46 am
superbadgirl: (Default)
Ugh, I am so sick of people over tagging a story. If I'm reading an explicit story, I do not need to know every type of sex the couple in question is going to have.

Sex. Oral Sex. Sexual Content. Explicit Sexual Content. Het. Het and Slash. Heterosexual Sex. Rough Sex. Restraints. Begging. Wall Sex. Outdoor Sex. Shower Sex. Car Sex.

I would say all but the first are complete overkill, except if I'm already aware, by the genre, that I'm reading an E rated story (or rather not, because the tags frankly reduce my interest rather than pique it) involving sex.


That's a mild example the ones that really make me run away are the ones that don't just leave it at nipple play, but have to use fifteen tags regarding nipples. This, too, is mild. Picture that with the word anal.

Stop it. If something is dubious or non con, tag away. Otherwise, narrow it down so that your tag list isn't longer than your damned story.

Abuse of tags on this post is intentional.
superbadgirl: (wtf)
Seriously, I think most of the entries in my register for debit transactions are grocers, and yet I never seem to have any food! I'm once again hungry and mostly foodless. How does this happen? I'm spending a lot on food and not getting a lot in return, I think. It must be my attempt to eat healthier foods. Damn, it's expensive!

I need to go pick up some cheese to go with my whine.

Rapid change of topic: am I the only one just not that interested in Wee!chester stories? I don't really need to know their backstory more than they've revealed on the show. I don't need those blanks filled. What I would really like, though, are nice, long, plotted stories that could stand in for episodes. I tried reading some of the virtual season (which I don't get, because it's not like we actually NEED a virtual season; we're getting a real one), and they weren't really to my liking even though they fit my episodic criteria. I could just be too picky, huh.

Also, and this will unlikely be an unpopular viewpoint, but I just don't get how any male/male contact is automatically seen as slashy. It drives me kind of crazy, to be honest. Why can't two guys just smack each other on the shoulder without it having any sexual context? Why can't they have chemistry that's not so quickly turned into sexual?

This isn't just my incest-squick talking here. I remember at Gatecon a few years ago, I had to wait it out while MS and CJ stopped wrestling with each other and they jumped to the conclusion that my impatience meant I wasn't a slasher and didn't enjoy the show they were putting on. Uh, no. It's that what I was seeing wasn't homoerotic so much as two guys just being friends. If two men have chemistry together, it doesn't automatically mean, for me, that they'd sleep with each other or that I'd even imagine it. It means they're comfortable, friends and might even have something of a brotherly bond. My brain doesn't automatically go to slash. Why do so many people's brains?

Profile

superbadgirl: (Default)
superbadgirl

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 02:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios