Supernatural: No Exit
Nov. 2nd, 2006 10:20 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Ugh.
Thank goodness I'm brunette.
I don't even know where to begin. I spent half the episode wondering if anything was ever going to happen, and the other half wishing it would just be over already and looking for that non-existent exit.
This is probably hard to believe, but I'm not opposed to the idea of having recurring characters. If the right ones had been involved here, I might not have thought this episode was as dreadful as it was. Alas, the wrong new characters are pretty much all TPTB have given us this year.
Really, having someone in the kind of peril Jo was in should have evoked some kind of reaction, shouldn't it have? It didn't in me, though whoever wrote this made sure to hammer home that Dean was frantic to find the chick. I didn't pick up any shippy vibes (though I've no doubt that's what Jo and Dean were supposed to be giving off). If anything, it was more annoyance on Dean's part...and then his frantic search seemed more like he felt responsible for the green hunter who'd suckered him into letting her tag along. Ugh.
All Jo All Episode wasn't as terrible as it could have been, but NOTHING about this show was an acceptable reason to backseat Sam. And the same would be true if Sam had had a more active role and Dean was sent out for coffee or to "check the south side of the building." Watching one brother with some other person (especially one with whom he shares no chemistry) while the other pops in now and again is not why I watch this show. I get that they have a tough shooting schedule and they get tired. I really do. I can even feel bad for them, but damn - I work two jobs and really don't enjoy either; they're tolerable and they pay the bills, but I don't wake up excited to go do them. At least JA and JP love their exhausting job. (<--lol, different rant. I'll shut up.)
Please, boys, use that laptop I saw you puttering around on with the information Ash pulled together for you. You did it before. You can do it again. Did I say please? PLEASE. Stop using Ash as your go-to guy. Amazing how I could be annoyed by that guy when he didn't even make an actual appearance.
There were a couple of nice Dean moments. I would just prefer he have those moments with his brother and not Ms. Chippy.
I'd say the final ghostie showdown was anticlimactic, but that would imply there was suspense before the lame ending.
Ellen. WTF? So, Ms. Chuckles-Good-To-See-John-Winchester's-Boys-Come-On-In-I-Loves-You suddenly has issues with them and John. Okay, we knew she had issues with John, but it really makes no sense to me that she's all kind and helpful...except, really, she doesn't trust them farther than she can throw them. And if she wanted her daughter to avoid them, she should have told Ms. Chippy the truth. It's not their fault that she didn't, and it's not their fault her beloved husband got killed on a hunt with John. How does she know he screwed up and that's how hubby got dead? Maybe hubby screwed up all on his own. AND...if the only reason she maintains the bar is because her husband was a hunter, but she doesn't want her daughter in the life, why, why, why hasn't she ever, y'know, shut the fucking place down and got a different job? I mean, really. The. Roadhouse. Makes. No. Sense.
LOL, listen to me rant. These issues have been cumulating, so it's not just this episode that's making me fly off the handle.
It wasn't all bad, though. I found an emory board and had ample time to make my nails look great during the parts I found uninteresting. Which was most of the hour.
Thank goodness I'm brunette.
I don't even know where to begin. I spent half the episode wondering if anything was ever going to happen, and the other half wishing it would just be over already and looking for that non-existent exit.
This is probably hard to believe, but I'm not opposed to the idea of having recurring characters. If the right ones had been involved here, I might not have thought this episode was as dreadful as it was. Alas, the wrong new characters are pretty much all TPTB have given us this year.
Really, having someone in the kind of peril Jo was in should have evoked some kind of reaction, shouldn't it have? It didn't in me, though whoever wrote this made sure to hammer home that Dean was frantic to find the chick. I didn't pick up any shippy vibes (though I've no doubt that's what Jo and Dean were supposed to be giving off). If anything, it was more annoyance on Dean's part...and then his frantic search seemed more like he felt responsible for the green hunter who'd suckered him into letting her tag along. Ugh.
All Jo All Episode wasn't as terrible as it could have been, but NOTHING about this show was an acceptable reason to backseat Sam. And the same would be true if Sam had had a more active role and Dean was sent out for coffee or to "check the south side of the building." Watching one brother with some other person (especially one with whom he shares no chemistry) while the other pops in now and again is not why I watch this show. I get that they have a tough shooting schedule and they get tired. I really do. I can even feel bad for them, but damn - I work two jobs and really don't enjoy either; they're tolerable and they pay the bills, but I don't wake up excited to go do them. At least JA and JP love their exhausting job. (<--lol, different rant. I'll shut up.)
Please, boys, use that laptop I saw you puttering around on with the information Ash pulled together for you. You did it before. You can do it again. Did I say please? PLEASE. Stop using Ash as your go-to guy. Amazing how I could be annoyed by that guy when he didn't even make an actual appearance.
There were a couple of nice Dean moments. I would just prefer he have those moments with his brother and not Ms. Chippy.
I'd say the final ghostie showdown was anticlimactic, but that would imply there was suspense before the lame ending.
Ellen. WTF? So, Ms. Chuckles-Good-To-See-John-Winchester's-Boys-Come-On-In-I-Loves-You suddenly has issues with them and John. Okay, we knew she had issues with John, but it really makes no sense to me that she's all kind and helpful...except, really, she doesn't trust them farther than she can throw them. And if she wanted her daughter to avoid them, she should have told Ms. Chippy the truth. It's not their fault that she didn't, and it's not their fault her beloved husband got killed on a hunt with John. How does she know he screwed up and that's how hubby got dead? Maybe hubby screwed up all on his own. AND...if the only reason she maintains the bar is because her husband was a hunter, but she doesn't want her daughter in the life, why, why, why hasn't she ever, y'know, shut the fucking place down and got a different job? I mean, really. The. Roadhouse. Makes. No. Sense.
LOL, listen to me rant. These issues have been cumulating, so it's not just this episode that's making me fly off the handle.
It wasn't all bad, though. I found an emory board and had ample time to make my nails look great during the parts I found uninteresting. Which was most of the hour.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-07 06:31 pm (UTC)Seriously. I'm still having issues with this mother who wants, apparently, to protect her daughter from "the life," and yet has never simply removed herself and her precious daughter from the life. Sorry, sister, but you kind of lose your right to whinge about it when the most you do to protect your kid is make her your indentured servant.
Under the right circumstances, a few changes could have been decent for the show...but this crap just doesn't make any sense. And I certainly don't want to know MORE about these nonsensical storylines.
I want Sam and Dean, damnit, not Jo and Ellen. I don't care about Jo and Ellen and their dearly departed father/husband. If there's any dearly departed father I care about, it's John.
Blarg.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-09 06:15 pm (UTC)Absolutely. She placed the girl right in the exact place she'd need to be to most romanticize "the life" for her. After all, what *else* is this reasonably attractive girl, who is fascinated with hunting, going to hear about from all the hunters who come through and who are trying to make time with her--romanticized talk about "the life," which of course she would eat up. Ellen has allowed the girl to con and hustle her bar patrons, play poker with them, basically hang out with them as if she's "one of the guys"--she's gotten exactly the daughter she's raised.
You're right, under the right circumstances, a few changes would have been fine for the show, but, as it was, Supernatural worked perfectly fine as it was. It was as if they were trying to re-think the entire series. Now, with John gone, I resent like hell that they're trying to dump *more* issues on John, and on Dean and Sam, by making John supposedly responsible for Jo's father's death--I just hope that crap at the end of the last episode was their way of writing out the Roadhouse, Jo and Ellen, in one swoop, although I doubt we'll be that lucky.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-09 07:11 pm (UTC)WRITERS: Oh noes! We forgot to write in a love interest! There can be no UST or sexin' without a love interest. We can't have that! [writes furiosly]
WINCEST SLASHERS: We already had it covered, thanks bunches. [writes furiosly]
no subject
Date: 2006-11-09 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-09 07:23 pm (UTC)But I can definitely see the writers wanting (or maybe being told by the network) to inject some "much needed romance" into a show that had an all-male cast.
If the edict came down from the network, it was probably a combination of "we need a romance, so the girls will watch" with "she needs to be hot, so the boys will watch." Maybe a chaser of "make her a kick-ass chick" to shut up the feminists because she'd be a "strong" female character.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-09 07:26 pm (UTC)It's funny how TPTB never thought about how the two hot guys would be a draw for the girls and the horror-movie-of-the-week would be a draw for the guys. (With a little bit of bleed over for both groups.)
no subject
Date: 2006-11-09 08:11 pm (UTC)I think TPTB don't really care all that much about girls of any age watching TV. It's the menfolk who make all the money decisions for the household.
[pause for hysterical laughter from women everywhere, while men chuckle and act like they got the joke]
I think they see female characters as being there as objects for men to lust over (or view as a mother figure), while male characters are there for them to project themselves into.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-10 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-10 12:14 am (UTC)*nods*
It just feels like change for change's sake - not because there was any actual need to "fix" something. It wasn't broken. And even if it did need tweaking, there's a great deal of difference between a 45 degree change and a 180.