Judicial "Indiscretion"
Apr. 10th, 2007 07:43 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Ran out of deodorant, band aids, hair spray and pain medication all on the same morning.
Ugh.
And
betacandy, you were so right about not watching something just for an actor. I just cannot believe that Lifetime movie MS was just in. What was described as "blackmail and sexual intrigue" by Comcast was actually "blackmail for rape." I was quite horrified by the whole plot.
Ugh.
And
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 09:03 pm (UTC)I still can't figure out why anyone would root for a romance that would never work in the scope of the show - Jack/Sam could never come to fruition without fundamentally changing things and destroying the show. Of course, by dragging that shit out and making it so in-yer-face just to tease the portion of the audience who for some reason saw chemistry between Male Lead Character and Female Lead Character (because, really, everyone knows MLCs and FLCs belong together no matter what), they fundamentally changed and destroyed the show.
I just don't get it. Who wins in that scenario?
It's kind of like my frustration with the main romantic crap in Smallville. Everyone already KNOWS Clark and Lana do not end up together, so how could anyone actively ship them, as if the outcome would ever somehow change?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 09:56 pm (UTC)And that is FINE in my book. OK, Jack is sexy and maybe she'd like to jump his ass and shag him until he can't remember his name -- but she doesn't want to as much as she wants her career. And Jack obviously doesn't want to "tap that" as much as he wanted to go sit at a desk in Washington. Yeah, whatever. I'm totally cool with that. Really.
I completely hate that the writers play that coy card about ship to cater to current fans. It undermines Sam's character, it makes her look absolutely pathetic when it comes to personal matters, and it leads to things like the Pete stupidity. *sigh*
I think I'm preaching to the choir, though, so I'll just end my rant here. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 10:05 pm (UTC)It really is all about what it's done to Carter. What she did to Pete was unforgivable. I would *drop* a friend who I discovered pulling crap like that. If she could be that selfish and cruel (first by accepting his proposal when she apparently wasn't committed to him, second by dumping him only to run apparently to another man's house and STILL NOT GET A CLUE WHEN THERE'S ANOTHER WOMAN THERE!!!!) to someone she is supposedly in love with, how the hell would a mere friend have a snowball's chance of remaining unscathed. She's become a toxic character and I miss the Carter that should have been.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 10:22 pm (UTC)(Poor SBG only *thought* she'd left the SG-1 fandom behind. ;-) She doesn't know that the fandom knows where she lives in cyberspace and will haunt her forever. Bwahahahahahaha!)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-10 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 12:59 am (UTC)Hee hee. I don't mind. What the writers did to Sam...and, IMO, what they brought to us with Vala are two huge crimes against women.