superbadgirl (
superbadgirl) wrote2006-04-06 01:45 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Racism Today
As part of the package when switching P&C/Liability insurance, the new carrier will re-appraise all the properties. Quite an undertaking for an organization like this, as you can imagine, what with churches being scattered across western Washington.
The insurance company, lacking the manpower for such a task, has contracted with a third party. As expected, phone calls started coming in to verify that this was all on the up-and-up. We'll just forget that all congregations received a head's up from myself and from the insurance company that this would be happening.
So where's the racism in this story? There are separate appraisers for separate regions. The appraiser in Seattle proper and its suburbs is named Mr. Shultz and he's got no accent. The appraiser for the southern regions is named Mr. Tran and he's got a mild accent. Not one single person has called to make sure this wasn't hinky when Mr. Shultz was the assigned appraiser. EVERY single congregation called when it was Mr. Tran. It wouldn't have bothered me if it were just one congregation verifying Mr. Tran's right to appraise their property, but EVERY one?
What is it about Mr. Tran that makes people question him? Or, rather, what is it about people that make them question him?
The insurance company, lacking the manpower for such a task, has contracted with a third party. As expected, phone calls started coming in to verify that this was all on the up-and-up. We'll just forget that all congregations received a head's up from myself and from the insurance company that this would be happening.
So where's the racism in this story? There are separate appraisers for separate regions. The appraiser in Seattle proper and its suburbs is named Mr. Shultz and he's got no accent. The appraiser for the southern regions is named Mr. Tran and he's got a mild accent. Not one single person has called to make sure this wasn't hinky when Mr. Shultz was the assigned appraiser. EVERY single congregation called when it was Mr. Tran. It wouldn't have bothered me if it were just one congregation verifying Mr. Tran's right to appraise their property, but EVERY one?
What is it about Mr. Tran that makes people question him? Or, rather, what is it about people that make them question him?
no subject
no subject
Yep, because I don't think it's inherently racist to call to verify that someone is going to come look at all your stuff, but being on my end it's distintly troubling. I'm sure no one that called even gave it a thought that their motivation was questionable in the least, just like we all rarely notice how biased the local news sometimes is regarding race.
no subject
But assumptions like these can stay buried in your head until something forces them out into the limelight. It's depressing.
no subject
Personally, I'd call to verify no matter what the dude looked/sounded like. Maybe the first guy you mentioned just had a more trustworthy way about him? Some people give off more of a trustworthy vibe than others. Then again... *ignorant Canadian*
no subject
Calling to verify was fine...even though both the Diocese and the insurance carrier had provided information that stated this company would contact them to schedule appraisals, which should be verification itself, no? ;)
no subject
no subject
no subject